Are Crimes against Humanity More Serious than War Crimes?
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper addresses the question of the relative gravity of crimes against humanity vis-à-vis war crimes. The issue is tackled from a double perspective. First, the categories of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes are compared at the general or legislative level. The analysis is mainly based on international treaties and other instruments that consider these crimes from the viewpoint of their diverse nature. The author concludes that it seems possible to infer that genocide and crimes against humanity are considered more serious than war crimes. Secondly, the paper focuses on the judicial and sentencing implications of the determination of the degree of gravity of crimes. In this perspective, it examines Nuremberg and post-Second World War jurisprudence as well as case law of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda. The issue of national regulations concerning penalties applicable to the different categories of crimes is then tackled. This section of the paper also confirms that there is room for concluding that crimes against humanity are considered more serious than war crimes. However, the author stresses that, at the present stage of evolution of international criminal law, any possible answer can only be tentative.
منابع مشابه
The Russian Approach: The Fight Against Genocide, War Crimes, and Crimes Against Humanity
Despite some ambiguous periods in Russia’s history, its record in affirming the foundations of humanism in international relations is unquestionable. The new democratic Russia, which is faithful to traditions of humanism and mercy, is making strong efforts to defend victims of genocide, war crimes, and crimes against humanity. The experience of the international community in combating genocide,...
متن کاملCrimes against Humanity in the Modern Age
Despite the promises made after World War II to eliminate the commission of atrocities, crimes against humanity persist with horrifying ubiquity. Yet the absence of a consistent definition and uniform interpretation of crimes against humanity has made it difficult to establish the theory underlying such crimes and to prosecute them in particular cases. In the 1990s, several ad hoc international...
متن کاملA multidisciplinary approach to the investigation of crimes against humanity, war crimes and genocide: the Inforce Foundation.
Socio-political context A detailed examination of the socio-political context of the development and expansion of forensic anthropology and archaeology is outside the aim of this paper. For a more detailed consideration of this subject see Cox [I]. That paper considers why so many UK-based anthropologists and archaeologists seek to extend the traditional parameters of their subject beyond the a...
متن کاملSentencing by International Tribunals: a Human Rights Approach
The post-World War II trials established many important principles. Specifically, they defined crimes against humanity as part of customary law or of general principles of law, rendered unavailable certain defenses such as superior orders, and established notions of criminal participation through the principle of command responsibility. However, the international tribunals at Nuremberg and Toky...
متن کاملAddiction and Crimes in Iran
Illicit drug abuse continues to be a growing problem worldwide and a serious hazard to humanity. The crimes associated with drug abuse include sale or possession of drugs; property crimes or prostitution to support drug habits; and violent crimes reflecting out-of-control behavior. In fact, an offender drug use is involved in more than half of all violent crimes and in 60 to 80 percent of child...
متن کامل